Integrating Technologies. Building Trust. Transforming Nations. Capability Statement Submit an RFP / RFI +1 (000) 000‑0000

Home/Insights/Resources

Resources

White papers, reference architectures and technical briefs

Written for chief information officers, programme directors, procurement teams and the technical advisers who evaluate them.

Library

Request access

Some documents are released on request so we know who holds our architecture material.

Contact us

Capability statements

PDF
CAP‑01

Qcuboyds Corporate Capability Statement

Company overview, disciplines, methodology, certifications and programme experience. The document to attach to a pre-qualification response. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request
PDF
CAP‑02

Systems Integration Capability — Discipline Sheets

Two pages per discipline: identity, biometrics, borders, PKI, health, cloud and network. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF set]

Request

Reference architectures

PDF
RA‑01

National Digital Platform Reference Architecture

Foundational identity, functional layers, the enterprise integration layer and the shared national foundations beneath them. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request
PDF
RA‑02

Vendor-Neutral Integration Layer — Design Patterns

API gateway, event bus, canonical data model, consent and audit, and the abstraction patterns that keep components replaceable. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request
PDF
RA‑03

Offline-First Field Architecture

Deterministic reconciliation, conflict resolution rules and device attestation for environments without reliable connectivity. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request

White papers

PDF
WP‑01

Why Technology Selection Should Be the Third Decision

The sequencing argument: mission, requirements, architecture, then technology — and what goes wrong when the order is reversed. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request
PDF
WP‑02

Measuring Lock-In: A Practical Assessment Framework

A structured method for quantifying a government’s exposure to a single supplier across data, interfaces, commercial terms and knowledge. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request
PDF
WP‑03

Biometric Accuracy in the Field vs. on the Benchmark

Why published accuracy figures rarely survive contact with a real population, and how to benchmark before committing. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request
PDF
WP‑04

Designing for the Public Inquiry

Building national systems whose decisions, evidence and arithmetic remain defensible years after the staff who built them have moved on. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request

Procurement aids

PDF
PR‑01

Writing a Vendor-Neutral Technical Specification

Guidance and clause examples for specifying an outcome without inadvertently specifying a product. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request
XLSX
PR‑02

Technology Evaluation Matrix — Template

Criteria, weighting and scoring structure, with worked examples for biometric matching and PKI selection. [PLACEHOLDER — attach spreadsheet]

Request
PDF
PR‑03

Exit & Transition Provisions: A Drafting Checklist

The contractual provisions that preserve a state’s ability to change supplier, written to be adapted by government legal teams. [PLACEHOLDER — attach PDF]

Request

Platform documentation

Documentation for our two proprietary platforms is handled by the respective programme offices, where each request is reviewed before release.

WEB
WP‑00

A Secure Voting System Using Encrypted QR Codes and Blockchain Principles

The STAR™ secure voting architecture in full: seven modules, cryptographic identity control, the write-once hash ledger, observer oversight, sealed finalisation, and a candid account of what the architecture does and does not prove. Published openly — no request required.

Read
SET
STAR

STAR™ Electoral Integrity Platform

Chain of custody, offline-first accreditation, reference architecture and the public verification API. Four white papers.

View
NDA
NVDIS

NVDIS™ Non-Intrusive Vehicle Document Inspection System

The executive summary is available to mandating authorities on request. Technical specifications — operational methodology, software architecture, security framework, communication protocols and implementation model — are proprietary and disclosed only under confidentiality arrangements.

Request
[PLACEHOLDER — IMPLEMENTATION NOTES]
1. Place approved documents in assets/docs/ and update each href. 2. Decide per document whether it downloads directly or is gated behind the contact form — capability statements are usually open; architecture and electoral material is usually gated. 3. Add a published date and version number to every document so buyers can tell whether they are reading the current version.

Discuss your national programme with our engineering team

Bring us the mission, the constraints and the timeline. We will return an independent architecture assessment — not a product quotation.